Infamous fertility specialist opens Nairobi clinic amid ethics queries

Dr Nayana Patel, a globally recognised yet highly controversial fertility specialist, is now practicing medicine in Kenya.

This comes despite her being at the center of multiple malpractice allegations in India, where she has been accused of exploiting poor women through commercial surrogacy. 

Dr Patel, who has at least six documented malpractice cases in India, is currently operating a fertility clinic in the Parklands area of Nairobi under the name Nulife Advanced Fertility Centre.

While the female anatomy is complex and deeply valued—especially in matters of fertility—there is growing concern over how reproductive medicine is handled by some practitioners.

When a doctor facing malpractice allegations in another country is allowed to practice freely in Kenya, it raises serious concerns about medical regulation, oversight and patient safety.

A poster currently circulating on social media reads, “World-renowned Dr Nayna Patel’s Nulife Advanced Fertility – Now in Nairobi, Kenya.”

While this may seem like a welcome opportunity for many childless couples hoping to conceive, Dr Patel’s arrival raise important questions. Dr Patel gained international fame—and notoriety—for her pioneering role in commercial surrogacy in India.

Operating out of Anand, a small town in the rural state of Gujarat, she built an empire centered on surrogate motherhood.

Her clinic, often criticised as a “baby-making factory,” houses up to 100 surrogate mothers at a time in an adjoining dormitory. These women, many from underprivileged backgrounds, reside at the facility throughout their pregnancies.

According to Dr Patel, the surrogacy program is a feminist initiative aimed at empowering women and improving their socioeconomic status.

“These women are making a choice,” she has often argued, “and earning life-changing sums of money to support their families.”

However, human rights activists,medical ethicists, and critics worldwide see things differently. They accuse Dr Patel of commodifying the female body and exploiting vulnerable women for the benefit of wealthy, often Western, clients.

Dr Patel’s clientele spans the globe, including individuals from the UK, the US, Canada, Japan, and Australia— many of whom seek to have biological children through surrogacy. 

A recent documentary, which was given exclusive access to Dr Patel’s clinic, shed light on the deeply personal— and at times heartbreaking—stories of the women involved.

Among them is Papiya, a woman attempting surrogacy for the second time, and Vasanti, a mother of two currently carrying a child for a Japanese couple. Vasanti plans to use the earnings from the surrogacy to build a new home for her family. 

After giving birth, some surrogates are employed as nannies or even wet nurses, spending extended periods with the babies they have delivered before parting ways.

Canadian couple Barbara and her partner, for instance, have been waiting in India for paperwork that will allow them to take their two-month-old son, Ceron, back to Canada.

In the meantime, their surrogate, Edan, continues to care for the infant as a wet nurse, creating a bond that will soon be severed. 

While the surrogates receive compensation, the ethical debate rages on. Critics argue that the imbalance of power and socioeconomic status between the surrogate mothers and the foreign clients creates an exploitative dynamic.

Indian authorities have since moved to ban commercial surrogacy, although the legislation still allows altruistic surrogacy under strict guidelines.  Despite the gravity of the controversies surrounding her, Dr Patel’s operations seem to continue unhindered—now on Kenyan soil.

When The Standard reached out to Dr Patel’s clinic in Parklands to inquire about the approval process and regulation surrounding her practice, she promised to call back with information. However, no response had been received by the time of going to press.

This silence has only deepened public concern. Kenya, like many developing countries, struggles with regulatory enforcement in various sectors, including healthcare.

Allowing a doctor facing multiple malpractice cases in her home country to operate in Kenya may set a dangerous precedent. It raises questions about the due diligence conducted by medical boards, the Ministry of Health and other licensing bodies. 

“There must be strict oversight by the Kenya Medical Practitioners and Dentists Council (KMPDC) to ensure that such individuals do not exploit loopholes in our regulatory system, especially in sensitive fields such as surrogacy and fertility treatment. Kenya currently has no clear legal framework that permits or prohibits surrogacy, but that does not give a free pass to unethical practices that commercialize and commodify human life,” said Dr Davji Atellah, KMPDU Secretary General.

Dr Atellah warned that without proper checks, Kenya risks becoming a hub for unregulated and potentially exploitative reproductive services, reminiscent of the controversial ‘baby factories’ reported abroad.

“We must ask: who is vetting these practitioners? What systems are in place to ensure they uphold the highest medical and ethical standards? If KMPDC is allowing practitioners flagged for malpractice elsewhere to operate locally without adequate scrutiny, then the integrity of our entire healthcare system is at risk,” he stated.

Kenya Obstetrical and Gynaecological Society (KOGS) President Dr Kireki Omanwa said the doctor is not registered to practice in Kenya, noting that anything medical she does is illegal and criminal. “... I won’t be part of these shenanigans by companies taking advantage of weaknesses in our system,” he declared. He vowed to protect ethical standards in reproductive medicine.

The presence of Dr Patel in Nairobi is not just a medical issue but a deeply ethical one. It forces a national conversation about who is allowed to practice medicine in Kenya, what standards apply to foreign doctors, and how patient safety can be prioritised amid global medical tourism.